WEINIGEL; Martin
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for WEINIGEL; Martin.The latest application filed is for "flow cytometer and method of flow cytometry".
- WEINIGEL; Martin - Gorlitz DE
- WEINIGEL; Martin - Jena DE
- Weinigel; Martin - Wittenberg N/A DE
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Flow Cytometer And Method Of Flow Cytometry App 20220128451 - WEINIGEL; Martin | 2022-04-28 |
| Multi-Modal Imaging System and Method for Non-Invasive Examination of an Object to be Examined App 20210052160 - KONIG; Karsten ; et al. | 2021-02-25 |
| Flexible nonlinear laser scanning microscope for noninvasive three-dimensional detection Grant 9,176,309 - Koenig , et al. November 3, 2 | 2015-11-03 |
| Automated scanning cytometry using chromatic aberration for multiplanar image acquisition Grant 8,760,756 - Price , et al. June 24, 2 | 2014-06-24 |
| Flexible Nonlinear Laser Scanning Microscope for Noninvasive Three-Dimensional Detection App 20130088709 - KOENIG; Karsten ; et al. | 2013-04-11 |
| Automated scanning cytometry using chromatic aberrtation for multiplanar image acquisition App 20100172020 - Price; Jeffrey H. ; et al. | 2010-07-08 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 