Wehmeyer Donald T
USPTO Trademark & Patent Filings
Trademark applications and grants for Wehmeyer Donald T. Wehmeyer Donald T has 3 trademark applications. The latest application filed is for "CHICAGO INDUSTRIES"
- Company Aliases
- Wehmeyer, Donald T
- t donald wehmeyer
- Wehmeyer; Donald T. - Sumner WA
- Wehmeyer; Donald T. - Woodinville WA
- Wehmeyer; Donald T. - Roselle IL
- Wehmeyer; Donald T. - Fountain Valley CA
Trademarks Patents
| Patent Application | Date |
|---|---|
| Personnel lift devices 5,203,425 - 07/668,961 Wehmeyer April 20, 1 | 1993-04-20 |
| Vehicle fluidic drive circuit 4,691,795 - 06/746,786 Wehmeyer , et al. September 8, 1 | 1987-09-08 |
| Work platform centering apparatus 4,625,830 - 06/696,081 Wehmeyer , et al. December 2, 1 | 1986-12-02 |
| Translating mobile work platform 4,518,061 - 06/489,039 Wehmeyer , et al. May 21, 1 | 1985-05-21 |
| MOBILE SCAFFOLDING 3,817,346 - 05/282,157 Wehmeyer June 18, 1 | 1974-06-18 |
Mark Image Registration | Serial | Trademark Application Date |
|---|---|
"CHICAGO INDUSTRIES" 78565252 |
CHICAGO INDUSTRIES 2005-02-11 |
"DELYTE" 78523231 |
DELYTE 2004-11-27 |
"SWEET'N LYTE" 78523232 |
SWEET'N LYTE 2004-11-27 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 