loadpatents
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Weber Aircraft, Inc..The latest application filed is for "multi-function seats".
Patent | Date |
---|---|
Multi-function seats Grant 6,237,994 - Bentley , et al. May 29, 2 | 2001-05-29 |
Beverage making apparatus with can piercer Grant 5,899,137 - Miller , et al. May 4, 1 | 1999-05-04 |
Pivot for rear seat track fitting Grant 5,762,296 - Gilbert June 9, 1 | 1998-06-09 |
Base frame for an aircraft seat Grant 5,553,923 - Bilezikjian September 10, 1 | 1996-09-10 |
Apparatus for an energy dissipating seat leg Grant 5,522,640 - Bilezikjian June 4, 1 | 1996-06-04 |
Plastic bottom diaphragm for aircraft seat Grant 5,485,976 - Creed , et al. January 23, 1 | 1996-01-23 |
Armrest with video deployment system Grant 5,374,104 - Moore , et al. December 20, 1 | 1994-12-20 |
Hydraulic extendable legrest Grant 5,352,020 - Wade , et al. October 4, 1 | 1994-10-04 |
Track fitting for aircraft seats Grant 5,337,979 - Bales , et al. August 16, 1 | 1994-08-16 |
Seatback breakover device Grant 5,320,308 - Bilezikjian , et al. June 14, 1 | 1994-06-14 |
Stowable table system Grant 4,944,552 - Harris July 31, 1 | 1990-07-31 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.