Ward; Bennett Clayton
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Ward; Bennett Clayton.The latest application filed is for "moisture control label".
- Ward; Bennett Clayton - Midlothian VA
- Ward; Bennett Clayton - Denver NC
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Bonded fiber matrix containing encapsulation complex Grant 9,155,299 - Jacobson , et al. October 13, 2 | 2015-10-13 |
| Moisture Control Label App 20150287346 - Ward; Bennett Clayton ; et al. | 2015-10-08 |
| Bonded Fiber Matrix Containing Encapsulation Complex App 20120272572 - Jacobson; Richard Martin ; et al. | 2012-11-01 |
| Polymeric fiber rods for separation applications Grant 7,291,263 - Ward , et al. November 6, 2 | 2007-11-06 |
| Bicomponent fiber wick Grant 7,290,668 - Ward , et al. November 6, 2 | 2007-11-06 |
| Bicomponent fiber wick App 20050189292 - Ward, Bennett Clayton ; et al. | 2005-09-01 |
| Polymeric fiber rods for separation applications App 20050072737 - Ward, Bennett Clayton ; et al. | 2005-04-07 |
| Biaxially oriented films containing layers of polyethylene naphthalate bibenzoate (PENBB) and process for the production of these films Grant 5,919,536 - Bennett , et al. July 6, 1 | 1999-07-06 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 