Waple; Christopher John
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Waple; Christopher John.The latest application filed is for "automatic spoken language identification based on phoneme sequence patterns".
- Waple; Christopher John - Cambridge GB
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Automatic spoken language identification based on phoneme sequence patterns Grant 8,781,812 - Kadirkamanathan , et al. July 15, 2 | 2014-07-15 |
| Automatic Spoken Language Identification Based On Phoneme Sequence Patterns App 20130226583 - Kadirkamanathan; Mahapathy ; et al. | 2013-08-29 |
| Automatic spoken language identification based on phoneme sequence patterns Grant 8,401,840 - Kadirkamanathan , et al. March 19, 2 | 2013-03-19 |
| Automatic Spoken Language Identification Based On Phoneme Sequence Patterns App 20120232901 - Kadirkamanathan; Mahapathy ; et al. | 2012-09-13 |
| Automatic spoken language identification based on phoneme sequence patterns Grant 8,190,420 - Kadirkamanathan , et al. May 29, 2 | 2012-05-29 |
| Automatic Spoken Language Identification Based On Phoneme Sequence Patterns App 20110035219 - Kadirkamanathan; Mahapathy ; et al. | 2011-02-10 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 