Wanzakhade; Sanjay M.
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Wanzakhade; Sanjay M..The latest application filed is for "magnitude comparator circuit for content addressable memory with programmable priority selection".
- Wanzakhade; Sanjay M. - San Jose CA
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Magnitude comparator circuit for content addressable memory with programmable priority selection Grant 7,403,407 - Wanzakhade July 22, 2 | 2008-07-22 |
| Race condition improvements in dual match line architectures Grant 7,203,082 - Bhatia , et al. April 10, 2 | 2007-04-10 |
| Dual match line architecture for content addressable memories and other data structures Grant 7,200,019 - Bhatia , et al. April 3, 2 | 2007-04-03 |
| Priority encoder circuit for content addressable memory (CAM) device Grant 7,000,066 - Wanzakhade , et al. February 14, 2 | 2006-02-14 |
| Search engine device and method for generating output search responses from multiple input search responses Grant 6,954,823 - James , et al. October 11, 2 | 2005-10-11 |
| Result compare circuit and method for content addressable memory (CAM) device Grant 6,845,024 - Wanzakhade , et al. January 18, 2 | 2005-01-18 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 