loadpatents
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Walz; Alfred.The latest application filed is for "dna encoding ena-78, a neutrophil activating factor".
Patent | Date |
---|---|
DNA encoding ENA-78, a neutrophil activating factor Grant 5,401,651 - Walz March 28, 1 | 1995-03-28 |
Method for producing superfine powder in spherical form Grant 4,919,854 - Walz April 24, 1 | 1990-04-24 |
Apparatus for producing superfine powder in spherical form Grant 4,822,267 - Walz April 18, 1 | 1989-04-18 |
Method and apparatus for generating ultraviolet radiation and ozone Grant 4,504,445 - Walz March 12, 1 | 1985-03-12 |
Amplifier for electrical signals Grant 4,223,274 - Paulke , et al. September 16, 1 | 1980-09-16 |
Constant-current transformer for gas-discharge tubes Grant 4,213,076 - Walz July 15, 1 | 1980-07-15 |
Arrangement for ultrasonic-echo encephalography Grant 4,043,321 - Soldner , et al. August 23, 1 | 1977-08-23 |
Process for the manufacture of fibers from fusible materials Grant 4,001,357 - Walz , et al. January 4, 1 | 1977-01-04 |
Circuit For Operation Of Gas Discharge Lamps Grant 3,849,717 - Walz , et al. November 19, 1 | 1974-11-19 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.