Wallroth; Carl-Friedrich
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Wallroth; Carl-Friedrich.The latest application filed is for "anesthesia ventilating apparatus having a breathing circuit and control loops for anesthetic gas components".
- Wallroth; Carl-Friedrich - Lubeck DE
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Anesthesia ventilating apparatus having a breathing circuit and control loops for anesthetic gas components Grant 5,094,235 - Westenskow , et al. March 10, 1 | 1992-03-10 |
| Method for simulating and demonstrating the gas exchange during mandatory or assisted ventilation and apparatus therefor Grant 4,878,388 - Loughlin , et al. November 7, 1 | 1989-11-07 |
| Safety arrangement for filling and emptying an anesthetic vaporizer Grant 4,867,212 - Mohr , et al. September 19, 1 | 1989-09-19 |
| Device for supplying anesthetic dispensing systems Grant 4,825,860 - Falb , et al. May 2, 1 | 1989-05-02 |
| Anesthetic vaporizer Grant 4,693,853 - Falb , et al. September 15, 1 | 1987-09-15 |
| Arrangement for adding liquid anesthetic to the respiratory gas supplied to a patient Grant 4,611,590 - Ryschka , et al. September 16, 1 | 1986-09-16 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 