loadpatents
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Walker; Grant W..The latest application filed is for "horizontally-resilient golf tee mat".
Patent | Date |
---|---|
Horizontally-resilient golf tee mat Grant 4,913,442 - Walker April 3, 1 | 1990-04-03 |
Pipe joint Grant 4,746,147 - Walker May 24, 1 | 1988-05-24 |
Practice ball for golfers Grant 4,596,392 - Walker June 24, 1 | 1986-06-24 |
Impact barrier for vehicles Grant 4,008,915 - Walker February 22, 1 | 1977-02-22 |
Impact barrier and restraint Grant 3,982,734 - Walker September 28, 1 | 1976-09-28 |
Tubular member and process of forming a tubular member Grant 3,973,596 - Walker August 10, 1 | 1976-08-10 |
Shock Absorbing Structure Grant 3,768,781 - Walker , et al. October 30, 1 | 1973-10-30 |
Liquid Shock Absorbing Buffer Grant 3,680,662 - Walker , et al. August 1, 1 | 1972-08-01 |
Liquid Shock Absorbing Buffer Grant 3,674,115 - Young , et al. July 4, 1 | 1972-07-04 |
Liquid Shock Absorbing Buffer Grant 3,672,657 - Young , et al. June 27, 1 | 1972-06-27 |
Energy Absorbing Device Grant 3,666,055 - Walker , et al. May 30, 1 | 1972-05-30 |
Energy Dissipating Construction For Trains Grant 3,602,151 - Walker , et al. August 31, 1 | 1971-08-31 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.