loadpatents
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for WADA; Taemi.The latest application filed is for "device and method for controlling digital bidirectional communication".
Patent | Date |
---|---|
Device And Method For Controlling Digital Bidirectional Communication App 20090187937 - WADA; Taemi ;   et al. | 2009-07-23 |
Encryption/decryption device and method, encryption device and method, decryption device and method, and transmission/reception apparatus Grant 7,532,726 - Fukuoka , et al. May 12, 2 | 2009-05-12 |
Device and method for controlling digital bidirectional communication Grant 7,526,089 - Wada , et al. April 28, 2 | 2009-04-28 |
Device and method for error and sync detection Grant 7,139,289 - Fukuoka , et al. November 21, 2 | 2006-11-21 |
Encrypting/decrypting device and method, encrypting device and method, decrypting device and method, and transmitting/receiving device App 20050286720 - Fukuoka, Toshihiko ;   et al. | 2005-12-29 |
Digital two-way communication control device and its method App 20050147251 - Wada, Taemi ;   et al. | 2005-07-07 |
Device and method for error and sync detection App 20020097751 - Fukuoka, Toshihiko ;   et al. | 2002-07-25 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.