Vought Aircraft Company
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Vought Aircraft Company.The latest application filed is for "method and apparatus for cooling sensors in high temperature environments".
- Vought Aircraft Company - Dallas TX
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Method and apparatus for cooling sensors in high temperature environments Grant 5,450,753 - Maynor , et al. September 19, 1 | 1995-09-19 |
| Electronic slope detector Grant 5,432,503 - Pekar July 11, 1 | 1995-07-11 |
| Manually positioned computer controlled drilling machine Grant 5,383,751 - Wheetley , et al. January 24, 1 | 1995-01-24 |
| Method and apparatus for ultrasonic inspection of curved nacelle components Grant 5,372,043 - Speight, II , et al. December 13, 1 | 1994-12-13 |
| Automated extrusion processing machine Grant 5,315,906 - Ferenczi , et al. May 31, 1 | 1994-05-31 |
| Pressure balanced processing of composite structures Grant 5,242,651 - Brayden , et al. September 7, 1 | 1993-09-07 |
| Structurally-embedded electronics assembly Grant 5,184,141 - Connolly , et al. February 2, 1 | 1993-02-02 |
| NCAGE Code | 2D712 | VOUGHT AIRCRAFT CO |
| CAGE Code | 2D712 | VOUGHT AIRCRAFT CO |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 