loadpatents
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Von Bulow; Gotz.The latest application filed is for "lymphocyte surface receptor that binds caml and methods of use thereof".
Patent | Date |
---|---|
Lymphocyte Surface Receptor That Binds Caml And Methods Of Use Thereof App 20090226473 - Bram; Richard J. ;   et al. | 2009-09-10 |
Lymphocyte surface receptor that binds CAML and methods of use thereof Grant 7,355,005 - Bram , et al. April 8, 2 | 2008-04-08 |
Lymphocyte surface receptor that binds CAML and methods of use thereof App 20060101529 - Bram; Richard J. ;   et al. | 2006-05-11 |
Lymphocyte surface receptor that binds caml and methods of use thereof App 20050183148 - Bram, Richard J. ;   et al. | 2005-08-18 |
Antibodies to a lymphocyte surface receptor that binds CAML and methods of use thereof Grant 6,500,428 - Bram , et al. December 31, 2 | 2002-12-31 |
Nucleic acids encoding a lymphocyte surface receptor that binds CAML Grant 6,316,222 - Bram , et al. November 13, 2 | 2001-11-13 |
Lymphocyte surface receptor that binds CAML, nucleic acids encoding the same and methods of use thereof Grant 5,969,102 - Bram , et al. October 19, 1 | 1999-10-19 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.