Voegele; John M.
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Voegele; John M..The latest application filed is for "cardiac response classification using retriggerable classification windows".
- Voegele; John M. - East Bethel MN
- Voegele; John M. - Bethel MN
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Cardiac response classification using retriggerable classification windows Grant 10,898,142 - Meyer , et al. January 26, 2 | 2021-01-26 |
| Cardiac Response Classification Using Retriggerable Classification Windows App 20180249963 - Meyer; Scott A. ; et al. | 2018-09-06 |
| Implantable Cardiac Device With Dyspnea Measurement App 20130331902 - Hopper; Donald L. ; et al. | 2013-12-12 |
| Implantable cardiac device with dyspnea measurement Grant 8,515,535 - Hopper , et al. August 20, 2 | 2013-08-20 |
| Implantable Cardiac Device With Dyspnea Measurement App 20100137931 - Hopper; Donald L. ; et al. | 2010-06-03 |
| Implantable cardiac device with dyspnea measurement Grant 7,680,534 - Hopper , et al. March 16, 2 | 2010-03-16 |
| Implantable cardiac device with dyspnea measurement App 20060195149 - Hopper; Donald L. ; et al. | 2006-08-31 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 