loadpatents
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Viitala; Daniel W..The latest application filed is for "insufflation damper for endoscopic vessel dissector/harvester".
Patent | Date |
---|---|
Insufflation damper for endoscopic vessel dissector/harvester Grant 8,920,456 - Kadykowski , et al. December 30, 2 | 2014-12-30 |
Insufflation Damper for Endoscopic Vessel Dissector/Harvester App 20130281780 - Kadykowski; Randal J. ;   et al. | 2013-10-24 |
Blood vessel preparation and preservation kit Grant 8,123,672 - Viitala , et al. February 28, 2 | 2012-02-28 |
Blood Vessel Preparation and Preservation Kit App 20090112053 - Viitala; Daniel W. ;   et al. | 2009-04-30 |
Float-driven lever arm for blood perfusion air removal device App 20060041215 - Lindsay; Erin Jessica ;   et al. | 2006-02-23 |
Reinforced venous drainage catheter App 20030078564 - Viitala, Daniel W. | 2003-04-24 |
Volume control apparatus for a flexible venous reservoir Grant 6,113,575 - Viitala , et al. September 5, 2 | 2000-09-05 |
Blood oxygenation system and reservoir and method of manufacture Grant 5,514,335 - Leonard , et al. May 7, 1 | 1996-05-07 |
Venous reservoir Grant 4,643,713 - Viitala February 17, 1 | 1987-02-17 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.