Vey; Jeffrey L.
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Vey; Jeffrey L..The latest application filed is for "air spring linearizing suspension".
- Vey; Jeffrey L. - Troup TX
- Vey; Jeffrey L. - Whitehouse TX US
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Air spring linearizing suspension Grant 8,899,372 - Vey , et al. December 2, 2 | 2014-12-02 |
| Toe or camber adjustment mechanism Grant 8,708,353 - Vey April 29, 2 | 2014-04-29 |
| Running boards for three wheel motorcycles Grant 8,474,847 - Vey July 2, 2 | 2013-07-02 |
| Trailer frame Grant 8,356,839 - Vey January 22, 2 | 2013-01-22 |
| Lateral air bag for trike suspension Grant 8,342,548 - Vey , et al. January 1, 2 | 2013-01-01 |
| Running board for three wheel motorcycles Grant 8,342,549 - Vey January 1, 2 | 2013-01-01 |
| Running boards for three wheel motorcycles Grant 7,607,673 - Vey October 27, 2 | 2009-10-27 |
| Trike body Grant D547,701 - Vey July 31, 2 | 2007-07-31 |
| Three wheel motorcycle conversion assembly Grant 7,228,930 - Vey June 12, 2 | 2007-06-12 |
| Trike body Grant D529,841 - Vey October 10, 2 | 2006-10-10 |
| Three wheel motorcycle conversion assembly Grant 6,964,314 - Vey November 15, 2 | 2005-11-15 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 