Van Laar; Jacobus
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Van Laar; Jacobus.The latest application filed is for "hot blast stove dome and hot blast stove".
- Van Laar; Jacobus - Driehaus N/A NL
- van Laar; Jacobus - US
- Van Laar; Jacobus - Driehuis NL
- van Laar; Jacobus - Santpoort NL
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Hot blast stove dome and hot blast stove Grant 9,194,013 - Van Laar , et al. November 24, 2 | 2015-11-24 |
| Hot Blast Stove Dome and Hot Blast Stove App 20110200958 - van Laar; Floris ; et al. | 2011-08-18 |
| Refractory wall structure Grant 6,234,790 - Van Laar , et al. May 22, 2 | 2001-05-22 |
| Channel structure for flow of molten pig iron Grant 5,031,882 - van Laar , et al. July 16, 1 | 1991-07-16 |
| Horizontal coke-oven battery Grant 4,749,446 - van Laar , et al. June 7, 1 | 1988-06-07 |
| Cooled refractory lined shaft furnace and stave-cooler to be used therefore Grant 3,984,089 - VAN Laar , et al. October 5, 1 | 1976-10-05 |
| Apparatus for mixing two gas flows Grant 3,913,617 - van Laar , et al. October 21, 1 | 1975-10-21 |
| Metallurgical Furnace Lining And Method Of Production Grant 3,708,317 - Owen , et al. January 2, 1 | 1973-01-02 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 