Van Hoeckel; Martin Frank Clayton
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Van Hoeckel; Martin Frank Clayton.The latest application filed is for "autofocusing a macro object by an imaging device".
- Van Hoeckel; Martin Frank Clayton - Waterloo CA
- Van Hoeckel; Martin Frank Clayton - Woodstock CA
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Autofocusing a macro object by an imaging device Grant 10,212,330 - Van Hoeckel , et al. Feb | 2019-02-19 |
| Auto-focus control in a camera to prevent oscillation Grant 9,854,150 - Van Hoeckel , et al. December 26, 2 | 2017-12-26 |
| Camera having HDR during pre-flash Grant 9,706,130 - Hsu , et al. July 11, 2 | 2017-07-11 |
| Auto-focus Control In A Camera To Prevent Oscillation App 20170118395 - VAN HOECKEL; Martin Frank Clayton ; et al. | 2017-04-27 |
| Autofocusing A Macro Object By An Imaging Device App 20170118394 - VAN HOECKEL; Martin Frank Clayton ; et al. | 2017-04-27 |
| Camera Having Hdr During Pre-flash App 20160352994 - HSU; Cheng-Sheng ; et al. | 2016-12-01 |
| Electronic device and method of controlling same for capturing digital images Grant 9,503,643 - Van Hoeckel , et al. November 22, 2 | 2016-11-22 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 