Van Dyke; Korbin

Patent Applications and Registrations

Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Van Dyke; Korbin.The latest application filed is for "variable-length code decoder".

Company Profile

0.21.5

Van Dyke; Korbin - Sunol CA US
Van Dyke; Korbin - Fremont CA
Van Dyke; Korbin - Sunnyvale CA

*profile and listings may contain filings by different individuals or companies with the same name. Review application materials to confirm ownership/assignment.

Patent Activity

Patent	Date
Variable-length code decoder Grant 8,824,819 - Fogg , et al. September 2, 2	2014-09-02
Computing system having CPU and bridge operating using CPU frequency Grant 8,412,916 - Sfarti , et al. April 2, 2	2013-04-02
Method and apparatus for dynamic allocation of processing resources Grant 8,381,223 - Van Dyke , et al. February 19, 2	2013-02-19
Variable-length Code Decoder App 20120070094 - Fogg; Chad E. ; et al.	2012-03-22
Variable-length code decoder Grant 8,086,055 - Fogg , et al. December 27, 2	2011-12-27
Method and Apparatus for Dynamic Allocation of Processing Resources App 20110283293 - Van Dyke; Korbin ; et al.	2011-11-17
Method and apparatus for dynamic allocation of processing resources Grant 7,987,465 - Van Dyke , et al. July 26, 2	2011-07-26
Method Of Integrating A Personal Computing System And Apparatus Thereof App 20100262746 - Sfarti; Adrian ; et al.	2010-10-14
Variable-length Code Decoder App 20100208826 - Fogg; Chad E. ; et al.	2010-08-19
Method of integrating a personal computing system and apparatus thereof Grant 7,769,988 - Sfarti , et al. August 3, 2	2010-08-03
Method and Apparatus for Dynamic Allocation of Processing Resources App 20100122262 - Van Dyke; Korbin ; et al.	2010-05-13
Method and apparatus for dynamic allocation of processing resources Grant 7,661,107 - Van Dyke , et al. February 9, 2	2010-02-09
Encryption/decryption instruction set enhancement Grant 7,254,231 - Van Dyke , et al. August 7, 2	2007-08-07
Variable-length code decoder Grant 6,775,414 - Fogg , et al. August 10, 2	2004-08-10
Method and apparatus of configurable processing Grant 6,745,318 - Mansingh , et al. June 1, 2	2004-06-01
Floating point register stack management for CISC Grant 6,651,159 - Ramesh , et al. November 18, 2	2003-11-18
Method of manufacture and apparatus of an integrated computing system Grant 6,643,726 - Patkar , et al. November 4, 2	2003-11-04
Multi-branch resolution Grant 6,578,134 - Van Dyke , et al. June 10, 2	2003-06-10
Method and apparatus for interfacing a processor with a bus Grant 6,430,646 - Thusoo , et al. August 6, 2	2002-08-06
Method and apparatus for store-into-instruction-stream detection and maintaining branch prediction cache consistency Grant 5,649,137 - Favor , et al. July 15, 1	1997-07-15
Method an apparatus for store-into-instruction-stream detection and maintaining branch prediction cache consistency Grant 5,511,175 - Favor , et al. April 23, 1	1996-04-23
Method and apparatus for store-into-instruction-stream detection and maintaining branch prediction cache consistency Grant 5,226,130 - Favor , et al. July 6, 1	1993-07-06
Integrated single structure branch prediction cache Grant 5,093,778 - Favor , et al. March 3, 1	1992-03-03

uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.

While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.