Van Dyke; Don A.

Patent Applications and Registrations

Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Van Dyke; Don A..The latest application filed is for "method and apparatus to provide secure application execution".

Company Profile

2.19.9

Van Dyke; Don A. - Rescue CA
Van Dyke; Don A. - Pleasanton CA US

*profile and listings may contain filings by different individuals or companies with the same name. Review application materials to confirm ownership/assignment.

Patent Activity

Patent	Date
Method and apparatus to provide secure application execution Grant 10,885,202 - McKeen , et al. January 5, 2	2021-01-05
Method And Apparatus To Provide Secure Application Execution App 20190087586 - McKEEN; Francis X. ; et al.	2019-03-21
Method and apparatus to provide secure application execution Grant 10,102,380 - McKeen , et al. October 16, 2	2018-10-16
Method and apparatus to provide secure application execution Grant 9,087,200 - McKeen , et al. July 21, 2	2015-07-21
Context state management for processor feature sets Grant 8,631,261 - Van Dyke , et al. January 14, 2	2014-01-14
Context State Management For Processor Feature Sets App 20130219154 - Van Dyke; Don A. ; et al.	2013-08-22
Method And Apparatus To Provide Secure Application Execution App 20130198853 - McKEEN; Francis X. ; et al.	2013-08-01
Method And Apparatus To Provide Secure Application Execution App 20130159726 - MCKEEN; Francis X. ; et al.	2013-06-20
Method and apparatus for dynamic allocation of processing resources Grant 8,381,223 - Van Dyke , et al. February 19, 2	2013-02-19
Context State Management For Processor Feature Sets App 20130042093 - Van Dyke; Don A. ; et al.	2013-02-14
Method and apparatus for dynamic allocation of processing resources Grant 7,987,465 - Van Dyke , et al. July 26, 2	2011-07-26
Method and apparatus for dynamic allocation of processing resources Grant 7,661,107 - Van Dyke , et al. February 9, 2	2010-02-09
Multi-instruction set flag preservation apparatus and method Grant 6,904,515 - Van Dyke June 7, 2	2005-06-07
Partitioned addressing apparatus for vector/scalar registers Grant 5,745,721 - Beard , et al. April 28, 1	1998-04-28
Method and apparatus for chaining vector instructions Grant 5,640,524 - Beard , et al. June 17, 1	1997-06-17
Vector processor having registers for control by vector resisters Grant 5,544,337 - Beard , et al. August 6, 1	1996-08-06
Scalar/vector processor Grant 5,430,884 - Beard , et al. July 4, 1	1995-07-04
Method for inserting a path instruction during compliation of computer programs for processors having multiple functional units Grant 5,307,478 - Rasbold , et al. April 26, 1	1994-04-26
Method for optimizing instruction scheduling for a processor having multiple functional resources Grant 5,202,975 - Rasbold , et al. April 13, 1	1993-04-13
System and method for controlling a highly parallel multiprocessor using an anarchy based scheduler for parallel execution thread scheduling Grant 5,179,702 - Spix , et al. January 12, 1	1993-01-12
Computer with integrated hierarchical representation (IHR) of program wherein IHR file is available for debugging and optimizing during target execution Grant 5,175,856 - Van Dyke , et al. December 29, 1	1992-12-29

uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.

While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.