Van Brunt; Roger W
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Van Brunt; Roger W.The latest application filed is for "apparatus and methods for phase-locked loops".
- Van Brunt; Roger W - Santa Cruz CA
- Van Brunt; Roger W. - Santa Cruz CA
- Van Brunt; Roger W. - San Francisco CA
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Apparatus and methods for phase-locked loops Grant 8,664,991 - Van Brunt March 4, 2 | 2014-03-04 |
| Calibrated quadrature very low intermediate frequency receiver Grant 7,773,965 - Van Brunt , et al. August 10, 2 | 2010-08-10 |
| High-speed dominant mode bus for differential signals Grant 5,778,204 - Van Brunt , et al. July 7, 1 | 1998-07-07 |
| Common mode early voltage compensation subcircuit for current driver Grant 5,592,510 - Van Brunt , et al. January 7, 1 | 1997-01-07 |
| Communication node with a first bus configuration for arbitration and a second bus configuration for data transfer Grant 5,579,486 - Oprescu , et al. November 26, 1 | 1996-11-26 |
| Bus interconnect circuit including port control logic for a multiple node communication network Grant 5,485,458 - Oprescu , et al. January 16, 1 | 1996-01-16 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 