Vaccari; Franco
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Vaccari; Franco.The latest application filed is for "ski boot having a combined closure and heel-engaging member".
- Vaccari; Franco - Montebelluna IT
- Vaccari; Franco - Montebelluna Province of Treviso
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Ski boot having a combined closure and heel-engaging member Grant 5,826,355 - Vaccari October 27, 1 | 1998-10-27 |
| Sport boot with a fastening device to limit rearward swing or forward flex Grant 5,590,481 - Vaccari January 7, 1 | 1997-01-07 |
| Ski boot with toe piece and overlapping flap Grant 5,410,822 - Vaccari May 2, 1 | 1995-05-02 |
| Rear entrance ski boot Grant 4,719,709 - Vaccari January 19, 1 | 1988-01-19 |
| Heater device, particularly for ski boots Grant 4,507,877 - Vaccari , et al. April 2, 1 | 1985-04-02 |
| Ski boots Grant 4,232,459 - Vaccari November 11, 1 | 1980-11-11 |
| Foot clamping device particularly for ski boots Grant 4,179,827 - Vaccari December 25, 1 | 1979-12-25 |
| Shoe, particularly for general sporting activities and training Grant 4,132,016 - Vaccari January 2, 1 | 1979-01-02 |
| Ski Boot Grant 3,824,713 - Vaccari July 23, 1 | 1974-07-23 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 