loadpatents
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Ushijima; Hirobumi.The latest application filed is for "highly dense brittle-material structural member having impregnating property".
Patent | Date |
---|---|
Highly Dense Brittle-material Structural Member Having Impregnating Property App 20220073434 - SUZUKI; Muneyasu ;   et al. | 2022-03-10 |
Air-permeable sheet Grant 10,525,664 - Nomura , et al. J | 2020-01-07 |
Air-permeable Sheet App 20170232705 - NOMURA; Kenichi ;   et al. | 2017-08-17 |
Method for forming pattern Grant 9,697,954 - Nomura , et al. July 4, 2 | 2017-07-04 |
Method For Forming Pattern App 20150243441 - Nomura; Kenichi ;   et al. | 2015-08-27 |
Photoresponsive heterocyclic azo compound, method for producing the same, and optical information recording medium Grant 7,951,922 - Fukuda , et al. May 31, 2 | 2011-05-31 |
Photoresponsive Heterocyclic Azo Compound, Method for Producing the Same, and Optical Information Recording Medium App 20070242322 - Fukuda; Takashi ;   et al. | 2007-10-18 |
Process for producing hydrogen from hydrocarbon Grant 5,650,132 - Murata , et al. July 22, 1 | 1997-07-22 |
Aromatization process Grant 5,557,022 - Murata , et al. September 17, 1 | 1996-09-17 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.