University of North Carolina Chapel Hill

Patent Applications and Registrations

Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for University of North Carolina Chapel Hill.The latest application filed is for "synthetically functionalized living cells for targeted drug delivery".

Company Profile

1.19.3

University of North Carolina Chapel Hill - Chapel Hill NC US
University of North Carolina Chapel Hill - N/A

*profile and listings may contain filings by different individuals or companies with the same name. Review application materials to confirm ownership/assignment.

Patent Activity

Patent	Date
Synthetically functionalized living cells for targeted drug delivery Grant 11,400,114 - Polak , et al. August 2, 2	2022-08-02
Mu Opioid Receptor Modulators App 20200109126A1 -	2020-04-09
In Vitro capture and analysis of circulating tumor cells Grant 9,952,212 - Martin , et al. April 24, 2	2018-04-24
2-piperidinyl substituted N,3-dihydroxybutanamides Grant 9,908,851 - Zhou , et al. March 6, 2	2018-03-06
Synthetically Functionalized Living Cells for Targeted Drug Delivery App 20170266317 - Polak; Roberta ; et al.	2017-09-21
Metal-organic framework templated synthesis of porous inorganic materials as novel sorbents Grant 9,597,658 - Taylor-Pashow , et al. March 21, 2	2017-03-21
Nitric oxide microsensors via fluorosilane-based xerogel membranes Grant 9,476,851 - Schoenfisch , et al. October 25, 2	2016-10-25
Correctors Acting Through Msd1 Of Cftr Protein App 20160030406 - Van Goor; Fredrick F. ; et al.	2016-02-04
Advanced Semiconductor-conductor Composite Particle Structures For Solar Energy Conversion App 20140261646 - HOERTZ; Paul G. ; et al.	2014-09-18
Compositions and methods for double-targeting virus infections and targeting cancer cells Grant 8,138,200 - Kucera , et al. March 20, 2	2012-03-20
Methods and compounds for controlled release of recombinant parvovirus vectors Grant 7,923,436 - Monahan , et al. April 12, 2	2011-04-12
Contrast media for angiography Grant 6,943,269 - Gabriel , et al. September 13, 2	2005-09-13
Large-area individually addressable multi-beam x-ray system and method of forming same Grant 6,876,724 - Zhou , et al. April 5, 2	2005-04-05
Magnetic-flux conduits Grant 6,720,855 - Vicci April 13, 2	2004-04-13
X-ray generating mechanism using electron field emission cathode Grant 6,553,096 - Zhou , et al. April 22, 2	2003-04-22
Nanostructure-based high energy capacity material Grant 6,514,395 - Zhou , et al. February 4, 2	2003-02-04
Antifungal activity of dicationic molecules Grant 6,326,395 - Tidwell , et al. December 4, 2	2001-12-04
Nanotube-based high energy material and method Grant 6,280,697 - Zhou , et al. August 28, 2	2001-08-28
Automatic emergency and position indicator Grant 6,175,329 - Vicci January 16, 2	2001-01-16
.alpha.-olefins and olefin polymers and processes therefor Grant 6,034,259 - Brookhart , et al. March 7, 2	2000-03-07
Audio prescription instruction device Grant 5,835,455 - Hanson , et al. November 10, 1	1998-11-10
Multi-phase polymerization process Grant 5,824,726 - DeSimone , et al. October 20, 1	1998-10-20
Use of bis-(5-amidino-2-benzimidazolyl) methane (BABIM) to treat arthritis Grant 4,940,723 - Tidwell , et al. July 10, 1	1990-07-10

uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.

While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.