loadpatents
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Umber; Ray E..The latest application filed is for "automatic inline lubricator for a pneumatically driven surgical instrument".
Patent | Date |
---|---|
Oil cartridge for a lubricator for a pneumatically driven surgical handpiece Grant 7,568,554 - Umber , et al. August 4, 2 | 2009-08-04 |
Automatic inline lubricator for a pneumatically driven surgical instrument App 20050215984 - Umber, Ray E. ;   et al. | 2005-09-29 |
Resecting tool with independent variable axial extension for tool implements and guide sleeves Grant 6,209,886 - Estes , et al. April 3, 2 | 2001-04-03 |
Multiple chuck resecting tool Grant 5,893,851 - Umber , et al. April 13, 1 | 1999-04-13 |
Mutiple flat quick release coupling Grant 5,741,263 - Umber , et al. April 21, 1 | 1998-04-21 |
Surgical resection tool having an irrigation, lighting, suction and vision attachment Grant 5,569,254 - Carlson , et al. October 29, 1 | 1996-10-29 |
Surgical resection tool with a double quick release Grant 5,569,256 - Vaughn , et al. October 29, 1 | 1996-10-29 |
Apparatus for removing a prosthesis from a bone Grant 5,257,995 - Umber , et al. November 2, 1 | 1993-11-02 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.