Turek; John Joseph Edward

Patent Applications and Registrations

Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Turek; John Joseph Edward.The latest application filed is for "apparatus for scheduled service of network requests and a method therefor".

Company Profile

0.16.2

Turek; John Joseph Edward - South Nyack NY
Turek; John Joseph Edward - Nyack NY

*profile and listings may contain filings by different individuals or companies with the same name. Review application materials to confirm ownership/assignment.

Patent Activity

Patent	Date
Program product for an application programming interface unifying multiple mechanisms Grant 6,912,713 - Badovinatz , et al. June 28, 2	2005-06-28
Controlling a number of instances of an application running in a computing environment Grant 6,782,408 - Chandra , et al. August 24, 2	2004-08-24
Method and apparatus for scanning a web site in a distributed data processing system for problem determination Grant 6,671,723 - Nguyen , et al. December 30, 2	2003-12-30
Method and apparatus for scanning a web site in a distributed data processing system for problem determination Grant 6,615,259 - Nguyen , et al. September 2, 2	2003-09-02
Apparatus For Scheduled Service Of Network Requests And A Method Therefor App 20030126244 - SMITH, WILLIAM MEYER ; et al.	2003-07-03
Permission-based scanning of a web site Grant 6,530,022 - Blair , et al. March 4, 2	2003-03-04
Method and apparatus for scanning a web site in a distributed data processing system for problem determination App 20020178217 - Nguyen, Andrew Quoc Anh ; et al.	2002-11-28
Modifying an unreliable training set for supervised classification Grant 6,298,351 - Castelli , et al. October 2, 2	2001-10-02
Program product for an application programming interface unifying multiple mechanisms Grant 6,216,150 - Badovinatz , et al. April 10, 2	2001-04-10
Application end-to-end response time measurement and decomposition Grant 6,108,700 - Maccabee , et al. August 22, 2	2000-08-22
System for barrier synchronization wherein members dynamic voting controls the number of synchronization phases of protocols and progression to each subsequent phase Grant 6,052,712 - Badovinatz , et al. April 18, 2	2000-04-18
Application programming interface unifying multiple mechanisms Grant 6,026,426 - Badovinatz , et al. February 15, 2	2000-02-15
Program product to effect barrier synchronization in a distributed computing environment Grant 6,016,505 - Badovinatz , et al. January 18, 2	2000-01-18
In-box configuration apparatus for a computer system Grant 5,996,074 - Houck , et al. November 30, 1	1999-11-30
In-box configuration method for a computer system Grant 5,927,050 - Houck , et al. July 27, 1	1999-07-27
Barrier synchronization method wherein members dynamic voting controls the number of synchronization phases of protocols and progression to each new phase Grant 5,768,538 - Badovinatz , et al. June 16, 1	1998-06-16
Method of performing a parallel relational database query in a multiprocessor environment Grant 5,765,146 - Wolf , et al. June 9, 1	1998-06-09
Progressive content-based retrieval of image and video with adaptive and iterative refinement Grant 5,734,893 - Li , et al. March 31, 1	1998-03-31

uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.

While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.