Troxel; Gregory Donald

Patent Applications and Registrations

Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Troxel; Gregory Donald.The latest application filed is for "non-uniform per-packet priority marker for use with adaptive protocols".

Company Profile

0.20.8

Troxel; Gregory Donald - Stow MA US

*profile and listings may contain filings by different individuals or companies with the same name. Review application materials to confirm ownership/assignment.

Patent Activity

Patent	Date
Variable translucency no-sight routing for ad-hoc networks Grant 9,161,290 - Troxel , et al. October 13, 2	2015-10-13
Non-uniform per-packet priority marker for use with adaptive protocols Grant 8,625,605 - Kastenholtz , et al. January 7, 2	2014-01-07
Method and apparatus providing precedence drop quality of service (PDQoS) with class-based latency differentiation Grant 8,547,846 - Ma , et al. October 1, 2	2013-10-01
Integrity checking at high data rates Grant 8,539,608 - Troxel September 17, 2	2013-09-17
Packet-based and pseudo-packet-based cryptographic synchronization systems and methods Grant 8,437,475 - Milliken , et al. May 7, 2	2013-05-07
Packet-based and pseudo-packet based cryptographic communications systems and methods Grant 8,234,491 - Troxel , et al. July 31, 2	2012-07-31
Non-uniform Per-packet Priority Marker For Use With Adaptive Protocols App 20120176903 - Kastenholtz; Frank ; et al.	2012-07-12
Systems and methods for queue management in packet-switched networks Grant 8,204,069 - Jones , et al. June 19, 2	2012-06-19
No-sight routing for ad-hoc networks Grant 8,170,018 - Troxel , et al. May 1, 2	2012-05-01
Variable translucency no-sight routing for AD-HOC networks Grant 8,144,595 - Troxel , et al. March 27, 2	2012-03-27
Packet-based And Pseudo-packet Based Cryptographic Communications Systems And Methods App 20110173442 - TROXEL; Gregory Donald ; et al.	2011-07-14
Packet-based and pseudo-packet based cryptographic communications systems and methods Grant 7,831,825 - Milliken , et al. November 9, 2	2010-11-09
No-sight routing for ad-hoc networks Grant 7,768,943 - Troxel , et al. August 3, 2	2010-08-03
Systems and methods for queue management in packet-switched networks Grant 7,680,139 - Jones , et al. March 16, 2	2010-03-16
Network communication between hosts Grant 7,028,099 - Troxel , et al. April 11, 2	2006-04-11
Publishing node information Grant 6,996,084 - Troxel , et al. February 7, 2	2006-02-07
Packet-based and pseudo-packet based cryptographic communications systems and methods App 20050210242 - Troxel, Gregory Donald ; et al.	2005-09-22
Packet-based and pseudo-packet-based cryptographic synchronization systems and methods App 20050207580 - Milliken, Walter C. ; et al.	2005-09-22
Systems and methods for predictive routing Grant 6,850,524 - Troxel , et al. February 1, 2	2005-02-01
Publishing node information App 20020075807 - Troxel, Gregory Donald ; et al.	2002-06-20
Delivering messages to a node at a foreign network App 20020075866 - Troxel, Gregory Donald ; et al.	2002-06-20
Network communication between hosts App 20020078127 - Troxel, Gregory Donald ; et al.	2002-06-20
Routing messages between nodes at a foreign sub-network App 20020078238 - Troxel, Gregory Donald ; et al.	2002-06-20

uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.

While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.