loadpatents
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Trester; Sven.The latest application filed is for "integrated circuit with non-functional structures".
Patent | Date |
---|---|
Integrated circuit with non-functional structures Grant 11,177,210 - Trester , et al. November 16, 2 | 2021-11-16 |
Integrated Circuit With Non-functional Structures App 20210202379 - Trester; Sven ;   et al. | 2021-07-01 |
Integrated Circuit Having Functional Cells And Reconfigurable Gate-based Decoupling Cells App 20210020623 - TRESTER; Sven | 2021-01-21 |
Method of designing an integrated circuit Grant 10,755,019 - Trester , et al. A | 2020-08-25 |
Method Of Designing An Integrated Circuit App 20190236235 - Trester; Sven ;   et al. | 2019-08-01 |
Integrated circuit and method of making an integrated circuit Grant 10,115,676 - Trester October 30, 2 | 2018-10-30 |
Metal only post-mask ECO for integrated circuit Grant 9,892,966 - Trester February 13, 2 | 2018-02-13 |
Semiconductor die with backside protection Grant 9,741,671 - Trester , et al. August 22, 2 | 2017-08-22 |
Integrated Circuit And Method Of Making An Integrated Circuit App 20170125357 - Trester; Sven | 2017-05-04 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.