Trenkler; Werner
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Trenkler; Werner.The latest application filed is for "removable roof for a motor vehicle".
- Trenkler; Werner - Asperg DE
- Trenkler; Werner - Im Taschen DT
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Removable roof for a motor vehicle Grant 4,801,173 - Trenkler January 31, 1 | 1989-01-31 |
| Convertible top with interchangeable flexible and rigid rear windows for a passenger motor vehicle Grant 4,611,849 - Trenkler September 16, 1 | 1986-09-16 |
| Linkage arrangement for a convertible top Grant 4,553,784 - Trenkler November 19, 1 | 1985-11-19 |
| Mounting element with threaded member attached to a body wall of an automotive vehicle Grant 4,352,521 - Trenkler October 5, 1 | 1982-10-05 |
| Body for motor vehicles, especially automobiles, with a sliding roof having a frame bottom Grant 4,243,261 - Trenkler January 6, 1 | 1981-01-06 |
| Swingable searchlight for vehicles, especially passenger vehicles Grant 4,212,050 - Trenkler July 8, 1 | 1980-07-08 |
| Automotive Vehicle Body With Detachable Roof Section Grant 3,610,681 - Trenkler October 5, 1 | 1971-10-05 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 