loadpatents
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Toyo Chemical Co., Ltd..The latest application filed is for "optical disc accommodating case".
Patent | Date |
---|---|
Optical disc accommodating case Grant 6,685,015 - Uchida February 3, 2 | 2004-02-03 |
Adhesive transfer device Grant 6,125,903 - Uchida October 3, 2 | 2000-10-03 |
Inorganic hardening composition Grant 5,669,968 - Kobori , et al. September 23, 1 | 1997-09-23 |
Apparatus for producing corrugated tube Grant 5,593,535 - Hasegawa , et al. January 14, 1 | 1997-01-14 |
Disc accommodation device including movable disc holder Grant 5,593,031 - Uchida January 14, 1 | 1997-01-14 |
Optical disc accomodation device Grant 5,531,320 - Uchida July 2, 1 | 1996-07-02 |
Floppy disk container Grant 5,407,073 - Uchida April 18, 1 | 1995-04-18 |
Automatic adhesive transfer device Grant 5,380,395 - Uchida January 10, 1 | 1995-01-10 |
Method for continuously manufacturing synthetic resin tube Grant 4,878,976 - Asakura November 7, 1 | 1989-11-07 |
Plastic Radiation Indicator Of The Color Change Type Grant 3,743,846 - Matsumoto , et al. July 3, 1 | 1973-07-03 |
NCAGE Code | S4976 | TOYO CHEMICAL CO LTD |
CAGE Code | S4976 | TOYO CHEMICAL CO LTD |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.