Thoms, Roland
USPTO Trademark & Patent Filings
Trademark applications and grants for Thoms, Roland. Thoms, Roland has 1 trademark applications. The latest application filed is for "RIFF LAB"
- Company Aliases
- Thoms, Roland
- roland thoms
- Thoms; Roland - Freiburg DE
- Thoms; Roland - Freiburg-Tiengen DE
- Thoms; Roland - Cortland NY
- Thoms; Roland - Mullheim DE
| Entity Type | INDIVIDUAL |
| Address | 10 Blemer Place Danville, CALIFORNIA UNITED STATES 94526 |
Trademarks Patents
| Patent Application | Date |
|---|---|
| Composite shiftable aperture mask 5,686,784 - 08/402,796 Thoms , et al. November 11, 1 | 1997-11-11 |
| Method for manufacturing a shadow mask 5,484,074 - 08/237,501 Deibler , et al. January 16, 1 | 1996-01-16 |
| Etchant control system 5,387,313 - 08/095,400 Thoms February 7, 1 | 1995-02-07 |
| Multi-graded aperture mask method 4,632,726 - 06/630,776 Thoms December 30, 1 | 1986-12-30 |
| Television picture tube with aperture mask having recesses therein 4,518,892 - 06/416,571 Thoms May 21, 1 | 1985-05-21 |
Mark Image Registration | Serial | Trademark Application Date |
|---|---|
"RIFF LAB" 90638621 |
RIFF LAB 2021-04-12 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 