Thomey; Henry W.
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Thomey; Henry W..The latest application filed is for "serpentine drive system with improved over-running alternator decoupler".
- Thomey; Henry W. - Guilford CA
- Thomey; Henry W. - Gilford CA
- Thomey; Henry W. - all Windsor Ontario CA
- Thomey; Henry W. - Windsor CA
- Thomey; Henry W. - Keswick CA
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Serpentine drive system with improved over-running alternator decoupler Grant 6,083,130 - Mevissen , et al. July 4, 2 | 2000-07-04 |
| Shaft decoupler Grant 6,044,943 - Bytzek , et al. April 4, 2 | 2000-04-04 |
| Belt tensioner, belt drive sytstem, and method Grant 5,098,347 - Sajczvk , et al. March 24, 1 | 1992-03-24 |
| Pulley encased tensioner with damping Grant 5,045,029 - Dec , et al. September 3, 1 | 1991-09-03 |
| Self-aligning pivot bolt Grant 4,750,851 - Thomey June 14, 1 | 1988-06-14 |
| Belt tensioner Grant 4,696,663 - Thomey , et al. September 29, 1 | 1987-09-29 |
| Belt tensioner Grant 4,557,707 - Thomey December 10, 1 | 1985-12-10 |
| Belt tensioner with variably proportional damping Grant 4,473,362 - Thomey , et al. September 25, 1 | 1984-09-25 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 