THOMAS; Daniel John
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for THOMAS; Daniel John.The latest application filed is for "drive shaft for a surgical instrument".
- THOMAS; Daniel John - Cardiff GB
- THOMAS; Daniel John - Rumney GB
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Drive Shaft For A Surgical Instrument App 20210298820 - THOMAS; Daniel John ; et al. | 2021-09-30 |
| Manufacturing electrosurgical instruments Grant 11,007,002 - Thomas , et al. May 18, 2 | 2021-05-18 |
| End effector for electrosurgical instrument Grant 10,603,103 - Thomas , et al. | 2020-03-31 |
| Electrosurgical instrument Grant 10,413,352 - Thomas , et al. Sept | 2019-09-17 |
| Method of amputating and morcellating a uterus Grant 10,179,004 - Thomas , et al. Ja | 2019-01-15 |
| End Effector For Electrosurgical Instrument App 20160199124 - THOMAS; Daniel John ; et al. | 2016-07-14 |
| Electrosurgical Instrument App 20160199123 - THOMAS; Daniel John ; et al. | 2016-07-14 |
| Manufacturing Electrosurgical Instruments App 20160199120 - Thomas; Daniel John ; et al. | 2016-07-14 |
| Method Of Amputating And Morcellating A Uterus App 20160113679 - THOMAS; Daniel John ; et al. | 2016-04-28 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 