Tesch; Mirko
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Tesch; Mirko.The latest application filed is for "cosmetic emulsifier combination".
- Tesch; Mirko - Hamburg DE
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Cosmetic or dermatological stick Grant 8,329,200 - Bauer , et al. December 11, 2 | 2012-12-11 |
| Cosmetic Emulsifier Combination App 20110091400 - Tesch; Mirko ; et al. | 2011-04-21 |
| Cosmetic Preparation With Vinylpyrrolidone/acrylic Acid Copolymer App 20080193395 - VIALA; Sophie ; et al. | 2008-08-14 |
| Crosslinked cosmetic or pharmaceutical phospholipid-containing gels and emulsions based on ethylene oxide-containing or propylene oxide-containing emulsifiers App 20060002964 - Schreiber; Jorg ; et al. | 2006-01-05 |
| Crosslinked cosmetic or pharmaceutical phospholipid-containing gels and emulsions based on ethylene oxide-containing or propylene oxide-containing emulsifiers App 20050142153 - Schreiber, Jorg ; et al. | 2005-06-30 |
| Cosmetic or pharmaceutical, low-viscosity oil-in-water emulsions containing phospholipids App 20050124705 - Schreiber, Jorg ; et al. | 2005-06-09 |
| Cosmetic or dermatological stick App 20040258721 - Bauer, Anja ; et al. | 2004-12-23 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 