loadpatents
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Teneyck; John D..The latest application filed is for "amorphous non-intumescent inorganic fiber mat for low temperature exhaust gas treatment device".
Patent | Date |
---|---|
Support element for fragile structures such as catalytic converters Grant 8,404,187 - Fernando , et al. March 26, 2 | 2013-03-26 |
Amorphous non-intumescent inorganic fiber mat for low temperature exhaust gas treatment device Grant 6,855,298 - TenEyck February 15, 2 | 2005-02-15 |
Amorphous non-intumescent inorganic fiber mat for low temperature exhaust gas treatment device App 20010024626 - TenEyck, John D. | 2001-09-27 |
Amorphous non-intumescent inorganic fiber mat for low temperature exhaust gas treatment devices Grant 6,231,818 - TenEyck May 15, 2 | 2001-05-15 |
High temperature stable continuous filament glass ceramic fiber Grant 5,585,312 - TenEyck , et al. December 17, 1 | 1996-12-17 |
High temperature stable continuous filament glass ceramic fibers Grant 5,569,629 - TenEyck , et al. October 29, 1 | 1996-10-29 |
Two part castable ceramic cement Grant 4,442,219 - TenEyck , et al. April 10, 1 | 1984-04-10 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.