Taya; Akira
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Taya; Akira.The latest application filed is for "fluorescent lamp with phosphor having coated phosphor particles".
- Taya; Akira - Kawasaki JP
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Fluorescent lamp with phosphor having coated phosphor particles Grant 5,289,081 - Tamatani , et al. February 22, 1 | 1994-02-22 |
| Ultraviolet-suppressed light source, coating agent used in the same, and method for manufacturing the same Grant 5,051,650 - Taya , et al. September 24, 1 | 1991-09-24 |
| Color liquid crystal display device Grant 4,929,061 - Tominaga , et al. May 29, 1 | 1990-05-29 |
| Halophosphate phosphor and fluorescent lamp using the same Grant 4,663,563 - Taya , et al. May 5, 1 | 1987-05-05 |
| Solid-state device having a plurality of optical functions Grant 4,534,622 - Harada , et al. August 13, 1 | 1985-08-13 |
| Blue-green emitting halophosphate phosphor Grant 4,500,443 - Taya , et al. February 19, 1 | 1985-02-19 |
| Method and apparatus for treating fluorescent substance Grant 4,397,885 - Akai , et al. August 9, 1 | 1983-08-09 |
| Fluorescent lamp Grant 4,199,707 - Akiyama , et al. April 22, 1 | 1980-04-22 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 