Taprogge Gesellschaft mbH
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Taprogge Gesellschaft mbH.The latest application filed is for "cost-orientated control of a regenerable filter".
- Taprogge Gesellschaft mbH - Wetter DE
- Taprogge Gesellschaft mbH - Dusseldorf DE
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Cost-orientated control of a regenerable filter Grant 6,030,525 - Eimer , et al. February 29, 2 | 2000-02-29 |
| Device for the mechanical cleansing of fluids Grant 4,904,397 - Eimer , et al. February 27, 1 | 1990-02-27 |
| Pipeline sieve with a suction removal device Grant 4,867,879 - Muller September 19, 1 | 1989-09-19 |
| Apparatus for the mechanical cleaning of a cold-water stream Grant 4,582,603 - Nasse April 15, 1 | 1986-04-15 |
| Batch-type scrubbing-ball replacement system for heat exchanger Grant 4,556,102 - Bochinski , et al. December 3, 1 | 1985-12-03 |
| Ball-measuring system for self-cleaning heat exchanger Grant 4,554,965 - Bochinski , et al. November 26, 1 | 1985-11-26 |
| Cleaning member for cleaning the interior of heat exchanger tubes Grant 4,383,346 - Bochinski , et al. May 17, 1 | 1983-05-17 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 