loadpatents
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Tang; Rujing.The latest application filed is for "securitization of virtual objects".
Patent | Date |
---|---|
Unmanned aerial vehicle system and methods for use Grant 10,358,196 - Tang July 23, 2 | 2019-07-23 |
Unmanned aerial vehicle system and method for use Grant 10,155,587 - Tang Dec | 2018-12-18 |
Securitization of Virtual Objects App 20180336601 - Tang; Rujing | 2018-11-22 |
Unmanned Aerial Vehicle System And Methods For Use App 20180194445 - Tang; Rujing | 2018-07-12 |
System and method for protecting internet user data privacy Grant 9,965,649 - Tang May 8, 2 | 2018-05-08 |
Unmanned aerial vehicle system and methods for use Grant 9,944,366 - Tang April 17, 2 | 2018-04-17 |
System And Method For Protecting Internet User Data Privacy App 20170337397 - Tang; Rujing | 2017-11-23 |
Door with warning light App 20170236389 - Tang; Rujing | 2017-08-17 |
Unmanned Aerial Vehicle System And Methods For Use App 20160340006 - Tang; Rujing | 2016-11-24 |
System and methods of using unmanned underwater vehicles (UUVs) along with tethers and tethered devices Grant 9,440,718 - Tang September 13, 2 | 2016-09-13 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.