loadpatents
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Tan; Pee Ya.The latest application filed is for "electrostatic discharge protection device with complementary dual drain implant".
Patent | Date |
---|---|
Electrostatic discharge protection device with complementary dual drain implant Grant 7,135,743 - Manna , et al. November 14, 2 | 2006-11-14 |
Triggered back-to-back diodes for ESD protection in triple-well CMOS process Grant 7,064,358 - Manna , et al. June 20, 2 | 2006-06-20 |
Electrostatic discharge protection device with complementary dual drain implant App 20060081933 - Manna; Indrajit ;   et al. | 2006-04-20 |
Electrostatic discharge protection device with complementary dual drain implant Grant 6,998,685 - Manna , et al. February 14, 2 | 2006-02-14 |
ESD protection device Grant 6,936,895 - Manna , et al. August 30, 2 | 2005-08-30 |
Triggererd back-to-back diodes for ESD protection in triple-well CMOS process App 20050133870 - Manna, Indrajlt ;   et al. | 2005-06-23 |
Novel ESD protection device App 20050077577 - Manna, Indrajit ;   et al. | 2005-04-14 |
Electrostatic discharge protection device with complementary dual drain implant App 20050056896 - Manna, Indrajit ;   et al. | 2005-03-17 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.