Tan; Joyce Tsi
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Tan; Joyce Tsi.The latest application filed is for "prostate-associated antigens and vaccine-based immunotherapy regimens".
- Tan; Joyce Tsi - Chapel Hill NC
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Prostate-associated antigens and vaccine-based immunotherapy regimens Grant 11,110,158 - Binder , et al. September 7, 2 | 2021-09-07 |
| Prostate-associated Antigens And Vaccine-based Immunotherapy Regimens App 20190038728 - Binder; Joseph John ; et al. | 2019-02-07 |
| Prostate-associated Antigens And Vaccine-based Immunotherapy Regimens App 20160375115 - BINDER; Joseph John ; et al. | 2016-12-29 |
| Prostate-associated antigens and vaccine-based immunotherapy regimens Grant 9,468,672 - Binder , et al. October 18, 2 | 2016-10-18 |
| Prostate-associated Antigens And Vaccine-based Immunotherapy Regimens App 20150246106 - Binder; Joseph John ; et al. | 2015-09-03 |
| Prostate-associated antigens and vaccine-based immunotherapy regimens Grant 9,066,898 - Binder , et al. June 30, 2 | 2015-06-30 |
| Prostate-associated Antigens And Vaccine-based Immunotherapy Regimens App 20130295110 - BINDER; Joseph John ; et al. | 2013-11-07 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 