loadpatents
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Tamura; Tooru.The latest application filed is for "liquid crystal device".
Patent | Date |
---|---|
Liquid crystal device Grant 4,911,958 - Mochizuki , et al. March 27, 1 | 1990-03-27 |
Method of producing an optical recording medium and an optical recording medium produced thereby Grant 4,900,649 - Mochizuki , et al. February 13, 1 | 1990-02-13 |
Electronic circuit module Grant 4,843,520 - Nakatani , et al. June 27, 1 | 1989-06-27 |
Organic chip capacitor Grant 4,555,746 - Mochizuki , et al. November 26, 1 | 1985-11-26 |
Plastic lens of neopentyl glycol dimethacrylate copolymerized with methoxy diethylene glycol methacrylate or diethylene glycol dimethacrylate Grant 4,536,267 - Ito , et al. August 20, 1 | 1985-08-20 |
Vacuum operated valve mechanism Grant 4,310,141 - Tamura January 12, 1 | 1982-01-12 |
Compound valve device Grant 4,276,746 - Yamanaka , et al. July 7, 1 | 1981-07-07 |
Gas filter device Grant 4,259,099 - Akabane , et al. March 31, 1 | 1981-03-31 |
Elastic surface wave device and method for making the same Grant 4,234,859 - Ikushima , et al. November 18, 1 | 1980-11-18 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.