Takeda Riken Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Takeda Riken Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha.The latest application filed is for "average frequency measuring apparatus".
- Takeda Riken Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha - Tokyo JP
- Takeda Riken Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha - JP JP
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Average frequency measuring apparatus Grant 4,468,614 - Takahashi , et al. August 28, 1 | 1984-08-28 |
| Waveform display apparatus Grant 4,464,656 - Nakamura August 7, 1 | 1984-08-07 |
| Variable tuning device Grant 4,460,879 - Hirose July 17, 1 | 1984-07-17 |
| Spectrum analyzer Grant 4,451,782 - Ashida May 29, 1 | 1984-05-29 |
| Semiconductor memory test pattern generating apparatus Grant 4,402,081 - Ichimiya , et al. August 30, 1 | 1983-08-30 |
| Semiconductor memory test equipment Grant 4,369,511 - Kimura , et al. January 18, 1 | 1983-01-18 |
| Self-compensating A-D converter Grant 4,315,254 - Honjyo , et al. February 9, 1 | 1982-02-09 |
| Frequency measuring apparatus Grant 4,310,891 - Niki January 12, 1 | 1982-01-12 |
| Program controlled testing system Grant 3,892,955 - Maejima July 1, 1 | 1975-07-01 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 