loadpatents
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Takata; Harry H..The latest application filed is for "baffle system for pneumatic applicators of solid particles".
Patent | Date |
---|---|
Baffle system for pneumatic applicators of solid particles Grant 5,114,078 - Takata May 19, 1 | 1992-05-19 |
Venturi system for agricultural spreaders of solid particles Grant 5,092,526 - Takata March 3, 1 | 1992-03-03 |
Distributor head for use with booms having shut-off capability Grant 5,028,009 - Takata July 2, 1 | 1991-07-02 |
Boom flow control mechanism for pneumatic spreaders Grant 4,964,575 - Takata October 23, 1 | 1990-10-23 |
Self-aligning coupler for fluid transmitting conduits Grant 4,717,077 - Takata January 5, 1 | 1988-01-05 |
Hydraulic metering control Grant 4,700,895 - Takata October 20, 1 | 1987-10-20 |
Modular low pressure strip spraying apparatus and system Grant 4,518,118 - Takata May 21, 1 | 1985-05-21 |
Manometer apparatus and system for distribution of liquid fertilizers Grant 4,479,444 - Takata October 30, 1 | 1984-10-30 |
Variable amplitude vibration generator Grant 3,909,147 - Takata September 30, 1 | 1975-09-30 |
Earth Working Machine Grant 3,746,101 - Takata July 17, 1 | 1973-07-17 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.