loadpatents
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Taft; Andrew A..The latest application filed is for "multi function exercise apparatus with resistance mechanism".
Patent | Date |
---|---|
Multi function exercise apparatus with resistance mechanism Grant 10,603,534 - Taft , et al. | 2020-03-31 |
Multi Function Exercise Apparatus With Resistance Mechanism App 20180021614 - Taft; Andrew A. ;   et al. | 2018-01-25 |
Multi function exercise apparatus with resistance mechanism Grant 9,694,229 - Taft July 4, 2 | 2017-07-04 |
Multi Function Exercise Apparatus With Resistance Mechanism App 20160375292 - Taft; Andrew A. | 2016-12-29 |
Multi function exercise apparatus with resistance mechanism Grant 9,403,048 - Balandis , et al. August 2, 2 | 2016-08-02 |
Multi Function Exercise Apparatus With Resistance Mechanism App 20150190667 - Balandis; Adolph James ;   et al. | 2015-07-09 |
Multi Function Exercise Apparatus With Resistance Mechanism App 20140213414 - Balandis; Adolph James ;   et al. | 2014-07-31 |
Noise maker for air filter Grant 5,352,255 - Taft October 4, 1 | 1994-10-04 |
Air filter for an HVAC system and method of manufacturing same Grant 5,342,423 - Taft August 30, 1 | 1994-08-30 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.