Szymanski; Todd M.

Patent Applications and Registrations

Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Szymanski; Todd M..The latest application filed is for "network operation center (noc) tool pattern detection and trigger to real-time monitoring operation mode".

Company Profile

0.26.0

Szymanski; Todd M. - Winter Park FL
Szymanski; Todd M. - Orlando FL

*profile and listings may contain filings by different individuals or companies with the same name. Review application materials to confirm ownership/assignment.

Patent Activity

Patent	Date
Network operation center (NOC) tool pattern detection and trigger to real-time monitoring operation mode Grant 10,432,472 - Douberley , et al. O	2019-10-01
System and methods for intelligent reset delay for cell sites in a network Grant 10,405,223 - Douberley , et al. Sep	2019-09-03
Analysis for network management using customer provided information Grant 10,402,765 - Lushear , et al. Sep	2019-09-03
Enhanced node B (eNB) backhaul network topology mapping Grant 10,015,089 - Gonzalez , et al. July 3, 2	2018-07-03
Wireless communication network adaptation based on collaborative data analysis Grant 9,967,753 - Jadunandan , et al. May 8, 2	2018-05-08
Dynamically creating and routing network records for dispatch prior to session timeout Grant 9,967,155 - Earl , et al. May 8, 2	2018-05-08
Validating development software by comparing results from processing historic data sets Grant 9,928,055 - Douberley , et al. March 27, 2	2018-03-27
Computer platform to collect, marshal, and normalize communication network data for use by a network operation center (NOC) management system Grant 9,912,547 - Douberley , et al. March 6, 2	2018-03-06
Cellular communication equipment radio resource adaptation Grant 9,736,700 - Douberley , et al. August 15, 2	2017-08-15
Component aware maintenance alarm monitoring system and methods Grant 9,699,020 - Lobo , et al. July 4, 2	2017-07-04
Sub class C reverse domain name system zone compilation Grant 9,491,135 - Earl , et al. November 8, 2	2016-11-08
Pre-emptive development conflict resolution Grant 9,395,979 - Bullukian , et al. July 19, 2	2016-07-19
Domain name system cache integrity check Grant 9,300,623 - Earl , et al. March 29, 2	2016-03-29
Application rate limiting without overhead Grant 9,071,576 - Earl , et al. June 30, 2	2015-06-30
Enabling user defined network change leveraging as-built data Grant 8,644,146 - Kurtz , et al. February 4, 2	2014-02-04
System and method for controlling access to a privileged permission level of a server computer Grant 8,539,557 - Buckner , et al. September 17, 2	2013-09-17
Associating problem tickets based on an integrated network and customer database Grant 8,458,323 - Baader, II , et al. June 4, 2	2013-06-04
End-to-end network monitoring Grant 8,355,316 - Lushear , et al. January 15, 2	2013-01-15
Service grouping for network reporting Grant 8,301,762 - Lobo , et al. October 30, 2	2012-10-30
Independent software development zones Grant 8,245,192 - Chen , et al. August 14, 2	2012-08-14
Translating network data into customer availability Grant 7,904,553 - Ham , et al. March 8, 2	2011-03-08
Flexible grouping for port analysis Grant 7,831,709 - Ham , et al. November 9, 2	2010-11-09

uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.

While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.