Sweet; Richard G.
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Sweet; Richard G..The latest application filed is for "flow sorter with video-regulated droplet spacing".
- Sweet; Richard G. - Palo Alto CA
- Sweet; Richard G. - N/A
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Flow sorter with video-regulated droplet spacing Grant 5,700,692 - Sweet December 23, 1 | 1997-12-23 |
| Nozzleless droplet projection system Grant 5,231,426 - Sweet July 27, 1 | 1993-07-27 |
| Method and means for sorting individual particles into containers for culturing, cloning, analysis, or the like Grant 4,667,830 - Nozaki, Jr. , et al. May 26, 1 | 1987-05-26 |
| Method and means for delivering liquid samples to a sample scanning device Grant 4,367,043 - Sweet , et al. January 4, 1 | 1983-01-04 |
| Measurement of angular dependence of scattered light in a flowing stream Grant 3,960,449 - Carleton , et al. June 1, 1 | 1976-06-01 |
| Particle Sorting Method And Apparatus Grant 3,826,364 - Bonner , et al. July 30, 1 | 1974-07-30 |
| Bacterial Colony Counting Method And Apparatus Grant 3,736,432 - Sweet May 29, 1 | 1973-05-29 |
| Fluid Droplet Recorder Grant 3,596,275 - Sweet July 27, 1 | 1971-07-27 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 