loadpatents
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Swahn; Alan Earl.The latest application filed is for "systems and methods for providing an internet browser zoom function".
Patent | Date |
---|---|
Systems and Methods for Providing an Internet Browser Zoom Function App 20220035512 - Swahn; Alan Earl | 2022-02-03 |
Systems and methods for providing an internet browser zoom and group bookmark functions Grant 11,150,779 - Swahn October 19, 2 | 2021-10-19 |
Rights Controlled Communication App 20200244630 - Swahn; Alan Earl | 2020-07-30 |
Rights controlled communication Grant 10,645,066 - Swahn | 2020-05-05 |
Systems And Methods For Providing An Internet Browser Zoom Function App 20190243528 - Swahn; Alan Earl | 2019-08-08 |
Internet Browser Zoom Function App 20140380200 - Swahn; Alan Earl | 2014-12-25 |
Internet browser zoom function Grant 8,838,736 - Swahn September 16, 2 | 2014-09-16 |
Multi-Window Internet Search App 20110295830 - Swahn; Alan Earl | 2011-12-01 |
Multi-window internet search with webpage preload Grant 8,015,259 - Swahn September 6, 2 | 2011-09-06 |
Information retrieval and display system App 20040049541 - Swahn, Alan Earl | 2004-03-11 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.