Trademark applications and grants for Surface-tech Llc. Surface-tech Llc has 26 trademark applications. The latest application filed is for "ACE XP"
State Incorporated | OREGON |
Entity Type | LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY |
Address | 888 Prospect Street, Suite 200 La Jolla, CALIFORNIA UNITED STATES 92037 |
Patent Application | Date |
---|---|
Asphalt Cement Concrete Interlayer System for Reflective Crack Relief 20220298082 - 17/752713 BLANKENSHIP; Phillip B. ;   et al. | 2022-09-22 |
Additive to Improve Properties of Asphalt Cement Concrete and Method of Manufacturing Thereof 20220185728 - 17/118213 SANTA CRUZ; Steven | 2022-06-16 |
Methods & Compositions to Increase Performance of Asphalt Cement Concrete comprising Recycled Asphalt Pavement 20210371339 - 16/888180 DENNIS; Joseph A. ;   et al. | 2021-12-02 |
Asphalt Cement Concrete Interlayer System for Reflective Crack Relief 20210155557 - 16/697825 BLANKENSHIP; Phillip B. ;   et al. | 2021-05-27 |
Novel Chemical Substitutions for Portland Cement Mixtures and Applications Therefor 20190241473 - 15/888017 GOERGER; Bryan | 2019-08-08 |
NCAGE Code | 1DAA2 | SURFACE TECH LLC |
CAGE Code | 1DAA2 | SURFACE TECH LLC |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.