Trademark applications and grants for Sugarcrm Inc.. Sugarcrm Inc. has 29 trademark applications. The latest application filed is for "SALES-I"
State Incorporated | DELAWARE |
Entity Type | CORPORATION |
Address | 548 Market Street, PMB 59423 San Francisco, CALIFORNIA UNITED STATES 94104-5401 |
Patent Application | Date |
---|---|
SMART LOGIN SESSION MANAGEMENT 20200358856 - 15/230465 Guerra; Filipe ;   et al. | 2020-11-12 |
AUTOMATED CUSTOMER INTEREST PROCESSING IN A CUSTOMER RELATIONSHIP MANAGEMENT (CRM) APPLICATION 20200118220 - 16/157051 Byrne; Steve ;   et al. | 2020-04-16 |
AUTOMATED COMMUNICATION PREFERENCE SETTING IN A CUSTOMER RELATIONSHIP MANAGEMENT (CRM) APPLICATION 20200118141 - 16/157044 Byrne; Steve ;   et al. | 2020-04-16 |
AUTOMATED CONFIGURATION OF AN APPLICATION INSTANCE 20200117476 - 16/158277 Byrne; Steve ;   et al. | 2020-04-16 |
APPLICATION PERFORMANCE PERCEPTION METER 20190213098 - 16/358624 Kolegayev; Dmitriy | 2019-07-11 |
NCAGE Code | 42MA4 | SUGARCRM INC. |
CAGE Code | 42MA4 | SUGARCRM INC. |
S.A.M. Registration | 42MA4 [168338536] | SUGARCRM INC. |
DUNS | 168338536 | SugarCRM Inc. |
SEC | 0001298253 | SugarCRM Inc of CALIFORNIA |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.