Stryker France
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Stryker France.The latest application filed is for "pedicle screw assembly and methods therefor".
- Stryker France - Pusignan FR
- Stryker France - FR FR
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Pedicle Screw Assembly And Methods Therefor App 20150105827 - Martin; Greg ; et al. | 2015-04-16 |
| Pedicle screw assembly and methods therefor Grant 8,894,692 - Martin , et al. November 25, 2 | 2014-11-25 |
| Two part intersomatic implant Grant 8,840,666 - Crozet September 23, 2 | 2014-09-23 |
| Spinal Implants App 20140058520 - Crozet; Yves Stephane | 2014-02-27 |
| Two part intersomatic implant Grant 8,449,613 - Crozet May 28, 2 | 2013-05-28 |
| Pedicle screw assembly and methods therefor Grant RE42,932 - Martin , et al. November 15, 2 | 2011-11-15 |
| Two part intersomatic implant Grant 7,056,341 - Crozet June 6, 2 | 2006-06-06 |
| Two part intersomatic implant App 20050283239 - Crozet, Yves | 2005-12-22 |
| Two part intersomatic implant App 20050273168 - Crozet, Yves | 2005-12-08 |
| Intersomatic implants in two parts Grant 6,855,168 - Crozet February 15, 2 | 2005-02-15 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 