Stryker Corporation
USPTO Trademark & Patent Filings
Trademark applications and grants for Stryker Corporation. Stryker Corporation has 114 trademark applications. The latest application filed is for "SKILL"
- Company Aliases
- Stryker European Holdings I, LLC
- STRYKER EUROPEAN HOLDINGS I, LLC,
- Stryker European Holdings I, LLC - Kalamazoo MI US
- STRYKER EUROPEAN HOLDINGS I, LLC - Kalamazoo MI US
| State Incorporated | |
| Entity Type | |
| Address | 2825 Airview Boulevard Kalamazoo, MICHIGAN UNITED STATES 49002 |
Trademarks Patents
| Patent Application | Date |
|---|---|
| Orthopedic Screw and Porous Structures Thereof 20220175431 - 17/677098 Willis; Steven ; et al. | 2022-06-09 |
| Technique For Processing Patient-Specific Image Data For Computer-Assisted Surgical Navigation 20220160261 - 17/668912 Herrmann; Florian | 2022-05-26 |
| Skull Base Closure Systems And Methods 20220039851 - 17/416081 Cushen; Patrick Eoin ; et al. | 2022-02-10 |
| EMBOLECTOMY DEVICE HAVING MULTIPLE SEMI-TUBULAR CLOT ENGAGING STRUCTURES 20210386444 - 17/461890 Grandfield; Ryan M. ; et al. | 2021-12-16 |
| IMPLANT DELIVERY SYSTEM 20210361454 - 17/396618 Loganathan; Siddharth | 2021-11-25 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 